Malaysia organizations don't realize severity of cyberattacks - ZDNet Asia: Malaysia organizations don't realize... http://t.co/3Yaa40JE
9 minutes ago by InfoSecurityVid on twitterZDNet is available in the following editions:
Chinese company claims design of its own P88 tablet device is original; threatens to sue Apple for stealing product design, according to reports.
Chinese hardware manufacturer, Shenzhen Great Loong Brother Industrial, is exploring a possible lawsuit against Apple over allegations the iPad design was a copy of its own tablet PC.
In a news report by Spanish daily El Mundo, the Chinese company's president, Wu Xiaolong, said in an interview that the iPad was similar to its P88, which was commercially launched in October last year.
Wu said he was "angry and flabbergasted" after seeing the news about Apple's iPad.
"It is certainly our design. They've stolen [it] because we presented our P88 to everyone six months ago at the IFA (International Electronics Fair) [in Berlin]," he was quoted in a Shanghaiist article, which cited extensively from El Mundo's report.
Shenzhen Great Loong Brother Industrial is based in Shenzhen, China. The Chinese city is recognized as a location where the manufacture of "shanzhai" or "copycat" mobile phones and other electronic devices is proliferate, Bryan Wang, Springboard Research's Asia-Pacific research director for connectivity and country manager of China, told ZDNet Asia in a previous report.
But Wu, in a separate report by PCWorld, was quoted to say about the company's P88: "For this thing, we are not 'shanzhai' because we were first."
Shenzhen Great Loong Brother Industrial submitted a patent application for the P88 last May, according to Wu, who noted that the approval process can take about a year, making it difficult for the company to sue Apple in the United States. But, he added that "if the iPad enters the Chinese market, we will sue them this spring".
An earlier report by the Shanghaiist stated that the P88 has a 10.2-inch screen that uses resistive touch and runs on an Intel Atom 1.6 gigahertz (GHz) chip, with a battery life of 1.5 hours. Comparatively, the iPad boasts a 9.7-inch capacitive multitouch screen, and is powered by a 1GHz Apple A4 custom-designed chip with a stated battery life of 10 hours.
Wu's threat of legal action is not the only lawsuit the Cupertino-based company may potentially face.
The New York Times last week reported that Fujitsu is currently talking to lawyers over the iPad naming rights. The Japanese company said it first applied for an iPad trademark in 2003 for a multifunctional device used by shop clerks to "verify prices, check real-time inventory data and close sales on the go", and which is sold mainly in the United States.
"It's our understanding that the name is ours," Masahiro Yamane, director of Fujitsu's public relations division, said in the report.
unfortunately Apple do 'copy' other competitors patented features in their products so why aren't they being sued they same way you're suggesting...
Lets not forget that a software designer in Vermont developed a music download and management software application and brought it to Apple. Apple did not express interest and therefor did not buy the guy's idea, but several months later came out with iTunes, which was a rip off his idea. Apple has a bad track record when it comes to ripping off others ideas, but they are not the only tech giant that does this, ie microsoft, cisco, google....
Years ago Apple sued GEM (a pre-Windows GUI) over the design of the trash can. Xerox PARC's comment at the time was something like "Gee we didn't sue them when they stole the transh can design from us..."
The thing is they say they launched it 6 months ago and had a patent 1 year ago I think for Apple to have got the iPad up and running from scratch as a copy of someone elses design in a year or less is pretty much impossible considering the r @ d that would need to be done as well as all the health and safety issues ana testing a new design has to go through. The man is talking out of his donkey.
The thing is they say they launched it 6 months ago and had a patent 1 year ago I think for Apple to have got the iPad up and running from scratch as a copy of someone elses design in a year or less is pretty much impossible considering the r @ d that would need to be done as well as all the health and safety issues ana testing a new design has to go through. The man is talking out of his donkey.
I agree, and to think that the Ipad technology is so similar to a big ITouch makes the argument even stupider. They already had most of the technology.
Unless Apple has filed for substantially the same patents at an earlier date, I'm not sure it matters who did what when. Does patent infringement have to be intentional? I don't think so. There are people who look around for inventions that were never patented by the original inventors and then go and file patents applications on them.
Ha Ha Ha... I'm assuming that was meant to be funny. Otherwise you'd be being an idiot. I wonder ?
Lets not forget that a software designer in Vermont developed a music download and management software application and brought it to Apple. Apple did not express interest and therefor did not buy the guy's idea, but several months later came out with iTunes, which was a rip off his idea. Apple has a bad track record when it comes to ripping off others ideas, but they are not the only tech giant that does this, ie microsoft, cisco, google....
iTunes was completely built on top of Soundjam a company purchased by Apple. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoundJam_MP
I own a license for Soundjam and was a Soundjam user in 1998 up until it was reskinned into iTunes in 2001.
They Bought Sound Jam form Cassidy & Green. It became the starting point of iTunes. Try not making stuff up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoundJam_MP
iTunes was completely built on top of Soundjam a company purchased by Apple. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoundJam_MP
I own a license for Soundjam and was a Soundjam user in 1998 up until it was reskinned into iTunes in 2001.
Let me get this straight. You think that after hearing from a software designer in VT, Apple said "Whoa! Good idea!" developed iTunes in a space of a couple of months, and then took it to market? Let me suggest two alternative proposals: (1) Apple already had all this in the works and wasn't interested because they were a few months from product launch and (2) you are a moron. These hypotheses explain all the facts,
They Bought Sound Jam form Cassidy & Green. It became the starting point of iTunes. Try not making stuff up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoundJam_MP
I agree, and to think that the Ipad technology is so similar to a big ITouch makes the argument even stupider. They already had most of the technology.
Let me see, slightly smaller screen, touch pad keyboard, APPLE CPU - may be 'similar', hardly breaches any patents!!!! Plenty of 'similar' MP3 players, no noted patents cases!!!!
Suggest P88 company does an 8 P and drops futile and stupid ie senseless accusations!!!!
Unless Apple has filed for substantially the same patents at an earlier date, I'm not sure it matters who did what when. Does patent infringement have to be intentional? I don't think so. There are people who look around for inventions that were never patented by the original inventors and then go and file patents applications on them.
well apple is apple we all gotta admit
You may be talking about the iTunes store, I don't know.
iTunes itself was developed from SoundJam a product from Casady and Greene, WHICH WAS BOUGHT BY APPLE!
Yes, other products appear to have been developed by others, but many programs and devices are in development for many years before reaching the market.
I agree, did anyone go to any of the links.
Different size, different shape, more ports, abysmal battery life.
The two are substantially different and the iPad looks like a big iPhone, Apple should sue itself. Also, the Chinese company is touting multitouch, doesn't Apple have some patents on that tech.
You would really print this article without any pics of the Chinese model??! How frustrating and pointless!
Follow the link to El Mundo. The article is in Spanish, but there are pictures of the P88 device.
Follow the link to El Mundo. The article is in Spanish, but there are pictures of the P88 device.
The P88 have more similarities with HP's Tablet, than with the iPad. besides any who have had it in had would not think iPad, but "f*** overpriced Chinese c***". It's generally made with off the shelf components and with very little R&D.
Battery power is less than 1.5H lifetime.
If Wu sue, then it will only be a publicity stunt and nothing else. Shenzhen Great Loong Brother Industrial is initially build on copying western products and their current "R&D" departsment is still not much to talk about.
The P88 have more similarities with HP's Tablet, than with the iPad. besides any who have had it in had would not think iPad, but "f*** overpriced Chinese c***". It's generally made with off the shelf components and with very little R&D.
Battery power is less than 1.5H lifetime.
If Wu sue, then it will only be a publicity stunt and nothing else. Shenzhen Great Loong Brother Industrial is initially build on copying western products and their current "R&D" departsment is still not much to talk about.
iPad is an evolution of iPhone/iTouch. That is where the design cues originates.
The "Shanzai" cats should ask themselves where they get the inspiration from at the first place.
The copycat calling a tiger a cheat. Shame on them!
The copycat calling a tiger a cheat. Shame on them!
Malaysia organizations don't realize severity of cyberattacks - ZDNet Asia: Malaysia organizations don't realize... http://t.co/3Yaa40JE
9 minutes ago by InfoSecurityVid on twitterMalaysia organizations don't realize severity of cyberattacks, country's minister of sci, tech, innovation says http://t.co/KGEHLi18 #in
9 minutes ago by EllyZDNetAsia on twitterMalaysia offers some manufacturing benefits over China http://t.co/mH23Uumr
24 minutes ago by daryllau on twitterMalaysia offers some manufacturing benefits over China - ZDNet Asia http://t.co/j04OySNl
1 hour ago by MalaysiaForum_ on twitterRT @zdnetasia: Idea Cellular follows Airtel, cuts India 3G tariffs. http://t.co/WNjnBHSX
1 hour ago by vijoy1509 on twitterMalaysia offers some manufacturing benefits over ChinaZDNet AsiaBy Ryan Huang , ZDNet Asia on May 22, 2012 (16 h... http://t.co/JgEnj6fl
1 hour ago by steamturbines on twitterMalaysia offers some manufacturing benefits over ChinaZDNet AsiaBy Ryan Huang , ZDNet Asia on May 22, 2012 (16 h... http://t.co/VTbclPHW
1 hour ago by steamturbines on twitterIndia 3G tariffs become more affordable http://t.co/7dHfD5xr @zdnetasia
1 hour ago by sonyamadeira on twitterRT @zdnetasia: Idea Cellular follows Airtel, cuts India 3G tariffs. http://t.co/BDMd0qm2
1 hour ago by GMosquisa on twitterRT @eccouncilapac: Value of big data analytics largely untapped http://t.co/aG9ixVph
1 hour ago by NHSingapore on twitterSingTel on acquisition spree, buys http://t.co/UzfGGmqH http://t.co/2SJXBrpG @zdnetasia
1 hour ago by sonyamadeira on twitter[Read] CFOs increasingly involved in #IT investment decisions http://t.co/jVHWyOdQ @zdnetasia
1 hour ago by BravuraFinTech on twitterChina solar cell makers seek Taiwan partnerships. http://t.co/yCKEwFw0
1 hour ago by zdnetasia on twitterIdea Cellular follows Airtel, cuts India 3G tariffs. http://t.co/WNjnBHSX
1 hour ago by zdnetasia on twitterIdea Cellular follows Airtel, cuts India 3G tariffs http://t.co/QMuksZTe http://t.co/erFSwAUB #arcavir
1 hour ago by V_RaV on twitterSo much as we know , MTK6575 extremely integrated frequency1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 processor, the superiority of 3G / HSPA Modem, and help the...
1 day ago by y15822137359 on 5 SaaS adoption speed bumps to avoidI reckon your view: "CRM is strategy, not software", if a company replicating the approach uses in ERP implementation into CRM, what they...
2 days ago by wykoong on Gartner: Mobile CRM gives better ROI than socialThis video will teach you about the Excel fill handle but also provide you with a workook to download... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=...
2 days ago by TradeBrother on A quick fill handle trick for Microsoft Excelwaiting...
4 days ago by eapete on What should count in a company's market value?Boy, you've opened a can of worms now.
Wait for the rants & raves.
I was puzzling before this whether to replicate the success formula we executed for a financial institute, and come out with a standard s...
5 days ago by wykoong on Drop the egos, copy ideas, then innovateEchelon 2012 - The Awesomer Tech Event in Asia
Echelon 2012 – SEA’s longest running tech startup event goes Awesomer. Catch 50 of Asia’s most promising startups & over 40 international speakers on June 11-12.
Startup Asia Jakarta showcases new product-ready tech startups. Plus: hackathon, exhibition, and speakers. Use promo code CBSi50 for 50% discount.
ZDNet Asia Intelligent Singapore video series
Featuring inteviews with CXOs who define "intelligence" in their markets and reveal how their companies drive business efficiencies through ICT.
Apple accused of copying iPad design
I think Apple should sue them for copying iPhone/iPad design form. They also probably did this assuming Apple would base the iPad on this design so they could use its launch to gain publicity and try to get some easy cash through courts.
RE: Apple accused of copying iPad design
unfortunately Apple do 'copy' other competitors patented features in their products so why aren't they being sued they same way you're suggesting...
RE: Apple accused of copying iPad design
Ha Ha Ha... I'm assuming that was meant to be funny. Otherwise you'd be being an idiot. I wonder ?
RE: Apple accused of copying iPad design
well apple is apple we all gotta admit
RE: Apple accused of copying iPad design
I agree, did anyone go to any of the links.
Different size, different shape, more ports, abysmal battery life.
The two are substantially different and the iPad looks like a big iPhone, Apple should sue itself. Also, the Chinese company is touting multitouch, doesn't Apple have some patents on that tech.