Credit card security to adapt to virtualization

 

Summary

The latest edition of the rules governing online credit card transactions now have provisions for functions involving some virtual environments

Events

IBM Technology Conference & Expo 2012
May 22, 2012

One World Hotel, First Avenue, Bandar Utama City Centre, 47800 Petaling Jaya, Selangor

Echelon 2012
June 11 and 12, 2012

University Cultural Centre, National University of Singapore

Startup Asia Jakarta 2012
June 7 and 8, 2012

12th Floor, Annex Building, Wisma Nusantara Complex, Jl. M.H. Thamrin No. 59 Jakarta 10350, Indonesia

MMA Forum Singapore
April 23-25, 2012

Grand Hyatt Singapore

The second edition of the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard was released last Thursday and contains minor changes to take virtualization into account and increase security levels.

The standard mandates that organizations handling payment card data adopt a minimum security posture for the processing of credit card transactions. Annual compliance validation is handled either internally or by external independent Qualified Security Assessors, depending on the size of the organization.

Virtualized systems are now included within the scope of PCI DSS system components, specifically in requirement 2.2.1, which details how compliance functions relate to some virtual environments. The PCI Special Interest Group, composed of auditors, merchants and financial institutions, will flesh-out how other environments will affect the standard.

Security company Imperva chief technical officer, Amichai Shulman, said changes in the document are minor, and include the scoping of PCI assessments, the adoption of risk-based approaches to vulnerability mitigation and the provision of further detail on standards for secure application coding.

Ronin Security director Matt Hackling said the standard does not shake-up the industry.

"No new shocks from version 2.0 from our perspective," Hackling said. "Nonetheless, organizations should consider the impact of implementing the standard."

Merchants will rank vulnerabilities "based on industry best practice", according to section 6.2 of the document. Security publication Dark Reading reports that low-risk vulnerabilities will no longer need to be assessed, based on a measure of "actual risk of exploitation and potential damages".

"Nobody is in business to be compliant. But our experience highlights a simple lesson: if you invest in controls to address PCI there is an incredible opportunity to improve overall security," Shulman said in a statement. "Since its inception, PCI has expanded awareness to data security risks and has driven major investments in data security technology and processes."

The new PCI DSS release cycle has been drawn out from two years to three, but the extension does not mean the security standards risk becoming redundant before they are updated, according to regional sales director of security firm Imperva, Kane Lightower.

Lightower said the standard is designed to enforce a minimum security benchmark and suggestions that it would become a hacker's playbook are wrong.

"Organizations should not be basing their security infrastructure entirely on compliance," Lightower said.

He said compliance is becoming "more mature", but said the lack of data breach disclosure laws in Australia means there is more carrot than stick.

"The consequences of data breaches here aren't as high as the US so the driver for compliance is not as strong."

A recent report (PDF) from Verizon Business revealed that a mere 22 per cent of organizations surveyed were fully compliant with PCI DSS.

The council said the release cycle will allocate a year to deploy the standard, review feedback and formalise the next revision.

The new PCI compliance will become effective from January 1, 2011.

This article was first posted in ZDNet Australia.

Talkback

Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

ZDNet Asia Live

RT @zdnetasia: Gartner: Mobile CRM gives better ROI than social. http://t.co/nTgj44H8

China hits back at Pentagon report on spy claims. http://t.co/CccR4SBM

China hits back at Pentagon report on spy claims http://t.co/YP380BYQ http://t.co/erFX4aVv #arcavir

http://t.co/VNaZtseV China hits back at Pentagon report on spy claims: Annual report by Pent... http://t.co/TvgCi5RE http://t.co/wiqY9ktt

#AntiVirus News: Mac users' indifference toward security 'worrying' http://t.co/spWS0CpU #AdAware

Mac users' indifference toward security 'worrying' http://t.co/BtVn1BAk
> expected! They still remember Mac vs PC ads
#infosec #news #apple

Pentagon report says China exploit US tech, conduct cyberespionage, China says it has been "unjustly criticized" http://t.co/P5wgqy6I #in

Mac users' indifference toward security 'worrying': 59 Jakarta 10350, Indonesia In light of the recent spate of ... http://t.co/Lxgnc1wM

Pakistan lifts block on Twitter - ZDNet Asia: Pakistan lifts block on TwitterZDNet Asia59 Jakarta 10350, Indones... http://t.co/61n85ajh

Pakistan lifts block on Twitter http://t.co/WHqoJOqm http://t.co/erFX4aVv #arcavir

http://t.co/VNaZtseV Pakistan lifts block on Twitter: Country restores access after briefly ... http://t.co/5gqegFWK http://t.co/wiqY9ktt

Pakistan lifts block on Twitter. http://t.co/y0arswpE

Mac users' indifference toward security 'worrying'. http://t.co/i7gZ8WVn

Mac users' indifference toward security 'worrying' - ZDNet Asia: Mac users' indifference toward security 'worryi... http://t.co/CD9pvW08

RT @zdnetasia: Mac users' indifference toward security 'worrying'. http://t.co/i7gZ8WVn

I reckon your view: "CRM is strategy, not software", if a company replicating the approach uses in ERP implementation into CRM, what they...

3 hours ago by wykoong on Gartner: Mobile CRM gives better ROI than social

This video will teach you about the Excel fill handle but also provide you with a workook to download... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=...

20 hours ago by TradeBrother on A quick fill handle trick for Microsoft Excel

waiting...

2 days ago by eapete on What should count in a company's market value?

Boy, you've opened a can of worms now.

Wait for the rants & raves.

2 days ago by eapete on What should count in a company's market value?

I was puzzling before this whether to replicate the success formula we executed for a financial institute, and come out with a standard s...

3 days ago by wykoong on Drop the egos, copy ideas, then innovate