Looking the other way
By
Charles Cooper, CNET News.com
Thursday, September 22 2005 12:17 PM
commentary The United States may have been the economic wunderkind of the 20th century,
but the 21st century belongs to China. And that's why every big technology
outfit in the world is champing at the bit.
Proponents of greater foreign engagement also see another benefit: They
expect the Middle Kingdom's transition to a market-based economy will help
loosen the authoritarian societal controls exerted by China's Communist Party.
Maybe so, but that's really long-term thinking. Few China experts predict
dramatic changes anytime soon. Most envision an uneven interregnum that lasts
quite some time--and that could force Silicon Valley to make hard choices about
where to line up.
Beijing's welcome mat is contingent on foreign guests respecting the rules of
the game and butting out of domestic affairs. The computer industry knows this.
Whatever their personal opinions, you won't find American technology execs going
out of their way to lecture their hosts about human rights. The usual
explanation is that it's none of our business and the Chinese wouldn't listen,
anyway. And in case you hadn't noticed, there's a gold rush going on.
Whatever
their personal opinions, you won't find American technology execs going out of
their way to lecture their hosts about human rights.
However, as much as these folks might prefer to play the role of
disinterested spectators, the flow of current events has a way of lousing things
up.
Consider the recent dustup over the jailing of a local journalist named Shi
Tao. Shi got sentenced to 10 years in jail for e-mailing an internal
Communist Party message to foreign media. The message warned of the potential
for social unrest in June 2004 connected with the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre.
Last week, Reporters Without Borders said it had documents implicating
Yahoo in the journalist's imprisonment. The watchdog organization said Yahoo
turned over information that Chinese authorities used to trace the message to
Shi Tao's e-mail account and computer.
This isn't the first time American information technology companies have been
accused of compromising with Chinese authorities. Critics charged Microsoft's
new Chinese portal with including blocks on certain words and phrases, including
"democracy," "freedom" and "human rights." Elsewhere, Google reportedly filtered
its Chinese-language site to omit news banned by the authorities.
But the difference here is that Reporters Without Borders charged Yahoo with
active collaboration that led to someone's imprisonment. When the news broke,
Yahoo's first response was to duck behind a scandalously amoral statement
claiming that Yahoo was required to adhere to local regulations and customs.
A few days later, co-founder Jerry Yang finally admitted the part his company
played in the Shi Tao affair. "I do not like the outcome of what happens with
these things," Yang said while attending a conference in China. "But we have to
follow the law."
Is
it so easy to look the other way when big bucks are at stake?
"We don't know what they want that information for, we're not told what they
look for," Yang was quoted as saying by The New York Times. "If they give us the
proper documentation and court orders, we give them things that satisfy both our
privacy policy and the local rules."
Yang reportedly received a nice hand from the roomful of mostly local
attendees. No surprise there. China's business elites have a stake in not
rocking the boat. Business is business and politics is politics. But though
Yahoo says it must follow local "customs," that's a slippery slope. What if
bribes are considered part of the normal business customs? What if a prohibition
against females driving is also a local business custom? "Certainly there's a
line between offensive and illegal, but just because something is custom doesn't
mean it's OK," a former Hewlett-Packard executive wrote me after spending
several years working abroad.
Of course, the United States is in no position to lecture. Nothing's
preventing the Recording Industry Association of America from putting the
squeeze on local Internet service providers around the country to divulge
customer data so the music industry can wage its antipiracy jihad. And if anyone
can guarantee that Uncle Sam won't abuse the provisions of the infinitely
reaching Patriot Act, I'd like to know about it.
Still, I am disappointed at how little character our own technology leaders
demonstrate under pressure. After all, many of the founding members of this
community had their world view shaped by the communal
and libertarian outlook of the 1960s. Is it so easy to look the other way
when big bucks are at stake?
The Shi Tao case will not be the last time Silicon Valley gets put on the
spot. Cuddling up to Beijing inevitably will raise discomfiting questions about
globalization and the cost U.S. companies must pay to operate in the countries
in which they do business.
biography
Charles Cooper is
the executive editor of commentary at CNET News.com.