Why Bing is not Wave of the future

By Staff, Special to ZDNet Asia
Monday, June 15, 2009 02:30 PM

commentary Recently, within minutes of each other, Microsoft and Google made hugely important announcements. Microsoft launched its rebranded, retooled search engine, inexplicably called Bing, and Google unveiled the no less strangely named Wave.

Bing is more immediately important to Microsoft than Wave is to Google, but Wave has industry-changing potential. Bing is a competent search engine that looks like Google search. Wave is an experiment in merging identity, data and messaging that looks like nothing on Earth.

Assessing Bing is easy: test it against Google search and see which is better. Assessing Wave is going to take years. Bing may be very good and Wave may be a bust, but the excitement is all Wave's.

That may seem unfair to Microsoft: it's easy to explain. Wave is pointing to the future, Bing to the past.

Why no Wave from Microsoft? It has the resources and should have the motivation, but it lacks the ability. With the huge power of being the entrenched incumbent comes ironic impotence: changing the status quo is all risk, no reward. Google can create a brand new way of communicating online, reinventing merrily as it goes, because it wins when people do more online. Microsoft only wins when people do more with Microsoft software within the existing Microsoft licensing model: any small team of employees building a substantially open source project with tectonic potential would last around two microseconds in the company.

The company would far rather burn billions in me-too consumer, online and mobile markets than invest them back in the core cash cow of corporate computing, where they'd be in danger of actually changing something.

It's the classic innovator's dilemma, with added anti-vim from Microsoft's corporate culture. Microsoft talks of innovation, and it invests in research, but it defaults to stasis and duplication.

Once upon a time, there was talk of breaking Microsoft up for antitrust reasons. That would have been very painful, but it could have given parts of the company the freedom and impetus to renew themselves. Those attributes are lacking now--without them, Microsoft is not Waving, but drowning.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Save to my library  Save to My Library  
Blog

Talkback 3 comments

Why Bing is not Wave of the future
I am a HUGE fan of the Wave but I don't believe that "the excitement is all Wave's".

If you look at Google's own stats you will see that Bing has been in the minds of people MUCH more than Wave: www.google.com...
Posted by anonymous on Monday, June 15 2009 07:58 PM

RE: Why Bing is not Wave of the future
Well, yes, but we're comparing the release of Bing with the announcement of Wave. We'll see who get's the last laugh, when Wave is released.
Posted by batu on Monday, June 15 2009 09:33 PM

RE: RE: Why Bing is not Wave of the future
Microsoft again proves to be its own undoing. After so many attempts, it still projects an image of stasis and corporate dullness, wanting to keep up but forever a step behind.
Posted by Tyler A. Roze on Tuesday, June 23 2009 10:58 AM

Use shades of gray to enhance scale in Excel

Microsoft Office Suite

Excel's palette is generous, but don't throw buckets of pigment all over your spreadsheets just because you can.


Read more »


Ultimate 2012 recovery site: the moon

Blog thumbnail

Have you seen the disaster movie "2012"? A friend from Control Risks and I did, and we reluctantly concluded we wouldn't be able to write off the cost of our..... by Nathaniel Forbes

Read more »

Tech Jobs Now!


Tags

  1. blog
  2. facebook
  3. game
  4. google inc.
  5. internet
  6. internet advertising
  7. internet service provider
  8. microsoft internet explorer
  9. mozilla firefox
  10. network
  11. social networking
  12. team
  13. video
  14. web
  15. web 2.0
  16. web browser
  17. web browsers
  18. web services
  19. web site
  20. web sites