commentary As you probably know all too well, most IT pros are nothing more than walking help desks when it comes to their friends, families, and even coworkers.
How many times have you ended up installing--or recovering--the system of someone who knows next to nothing about computers, let alone security? I admit it: I, too, am not immune to the pleas for help from my nongeek friends.
I recently found myself in one such situation. I was helping a non-computer-savvy friend set up his new Windows computer, and he and I started discussing Windows and security. While I was copying his files from his ancient Apple Macintosh IIcx to his new Windows PC, I noticed that the file sizes of the applications on his old hard drive were miniscule compared to Windows. In addition, his programs were much easier to use. (He still used Word 5.1 for the Mac.)
Even more comical was the size of his hard drive: 120 MB! Of that, he was only using about 30 MB for his programs and the document files he needed me to recover. Windows uses more than 120 MB just for the base operating system, but then again, that's because it's a much more complex and feature-rich OS, right?
When we began the process of setting up the new Windows machine, I told my friend that it would take about two hours to fully update and secure Windows and Office. After hearing this, he wasn't so sure he wanted to get rid of the Mac. All of this got me thinking about the increasing complexity of computer systems and their underlying security.
Internet and information security is the No. 1 issue for most corporations, and that's because they have no choice. Ignoring security means risking the loss of information and business intelligence, not to mention the potential legal, human resources, and public relations issues.
I'm never surprised when I read that more and more companies are making the move away from Windows. Windows is an expensive operating system to secure and support. And I think that Microsoft is failing to deliver on its promise of better security.
By this point, you would think that Microsoft would have at least included an administrative ability to disable or not install any Internet features, but it hasn't. More times than not, Windows systems are vulnerable right out of the shipping box.
In my opinion, regardless of what the so-called experts claim, we owe the majority of Internet insecurity to Microsoft. As the company added Internet feature after feature to the already bloated and buggy code of Windows, it opened the door to massive distributed exploits. In addition, it made the software too complex for the average user to use safely—or, for that matter, for the average corporation to maintain.
Play video
There are currently no comments for this post.