I guess I'm not seeing the point to this story. Of course IBM is recommending implementing RFID as they are selling solutions....and from a consumer standpoint it's pretty poor to compare a $2 million dollar item shuffling through warehouses as opposed to the more common $10 razor shuffling through WalMart. This article also doesn't even consider the implementations for privacy as well as the $10 million infrastructure needed to be in place to even start this process...making it really only usable by the top 5-10% of stores.

What a poor article with poor research. Move on people...nothing to see here.