Vendor : Stanford University
E-mail this page
Related Content
Remember this itemFormat: PDF
Date:
01/01/2009
Overview
Due to the similarities between spam and non-spam their original semantic analyzers are not an effective method to classify spam content. Since spam and non-spam documents are so similar, it is sometimes very difficult for a human to differentiate between the two. Because of these similarities, it is unlikely that any natural language analysis method will be successful in differentiating between spam and non-spam. However, using semantic analyzers to determine the usefulness of information on a webpage had much more promising results. Assuming the user is more interested in finding a quick answer to their query, a page with more textual information should have a higher rank. Their analyzers could help to determine this rank.
|
|
The Roots for a Greener World
Discover Hitachi's Environmental Vision 2025 and featured Eco-Products
The Desktop Virtualization Revolution is here!
Find our more with Citrix Simplicity is Power
Master in Organisational Leadership
Part-time masters program from Monash University. Find out more.
Lack of visibility into network issues and performance?
Find out today. Download SolarWinds FREE 30-Day Trial Software here.
Security Considerations for Cloud-Ready Data Centers - Download the whitepaper!
A network-centric approach to providing security in the data center delivers multiple benefits
IT Salary & Skills Report 2009
Join activeTechPros for free access to the report