"To advance American security, political and economic interests, the United States should focus greater attention upon fostering the expansion of foreign Internet access and use, particularly in nations that are economically marginalized or struggling to solidify democracy," the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights said.
The report, presented to top-ranking officials in the Bush administration on Thursday, advocates a policy of techno-activism abroad to fight foreign oppressive regimes and to pave the way for American high-tech companies.
"Because the US private sector remains a leader in all aspects of information technology, American firms are well positioned to provide the infrastructure, hardware, software and training needed as Internet use expands," the report notes.
The 200-page study likens the Internet--as a tool for democratization--to the influence of Radio Free Europe and Voice of America during the Cold War, noting that the Web has enormous potential in exporting American values and democratization in many repressive nations that restrict media and the press.
The study also references a recent estimate by the international press advocacy group Reporters Sans Frontieres (Reporters Without Borders), which says more than 45 countries "severely restrict" the Internet by forcing users to filter content, subscribe to a state-run ISP or register with authorities.
The group said some 20 nations, including Iran, Iraq, Libya, China, Cuba and North Korea and several other countries that the US keeps at a safe distance virtually ban the Internet from their borders. Such nations are just as likely to use the Internet against their own citizens, the Lawyers Committee said.
The report urges the Bush administration to call for end to all government restrictions on Web use, and to use its embassies and military bases abroad as a jumping off point for expanding public Internet access for non-commercial users.
Many of the study's suggestions beg the question of how much the US can actually accomplish in many repressive nations where only a small percentage of the population has access to a telephone, much less the Internet. However, its authors say they recognize this, and only want to encourage the administration to begin laying the groundwork for later improvements.
"While Internet access may rank low in the face of other major challenges such as clean water or the eradication of disease, the point here is that states that prohibit Internet access will become increasingly marginalized in the world economy," the authors note.











There are currently no comments for this post.