Google, Microsoft doomed to fail?

By Andy McCue, Special to ZDNet Asia
Monday, June 11, 2007 06:52 AM

Google and Microsoft could be among the famous high-tech names to disappear from the corporate landscape within the next 20 years if a cycle of how companies die repeats itself.

A study of the profits of 3,200 of the largest companies trading publicly on the U.S. stock exchange between 1960 and 2004 has revealed a third go out of business and a third are acquired on average 23 years into their existence.

The year-long study--carried out by Greg Hackett, Goodyear executive professor at the Kent State University business school--found that overall profits have declined by 40 percent in those 44 years to an average profitability of just 4.3 percent.

The study also shows that today 80 percent of companies are stagnating or declining and failing three-times faster than they did in 1960.

Hackett said: "Changes are coming faster and virtually no one is immune. For most companies out there it is just plain razor thin. Everybody gets into trouble. But when you are unprofitable three out of the last five years, it's gone. Kiss it goodbye."

Based on "lifecycle signatures" of declining companies in the study, Hackett predicts some of today's biggest corporate names will disappear--either by going bust or being acquired--within the next 20 years.

Companies on Hackett's 'danger' list include:

  • Amazon.com
  • Dell
  • Google
  • Microsoft
  • Starbucks
  • Wal-Mart
  • Yahoo!

The study, sponsored by data warehousing company Kalido, found the key reasons why companies fail include missing a major external event (such as the Internet); becoming inflexible over time as they get larger; having a short-term stock-market focus and following management fads; and using outdated, static planning processes.

Some of the most "deadly" forces include globalization, technology, customer loyalty--or the increasing lack of it--and demographic changes. Hackett said businesses will need to deal with information overload, be bold and take risks to survive today's threats.

He said: "There is no one who stands on the roof with binoculars and looks at what's on the horizon and current trends are making it worse. Information overload equals less insight. No one ever puts their feet up on the table and just 'thinks'. They have lost the instinct in the planning process. Get valuable information and pair it with instinct."

Andy McCue of Silicon.com reported from London.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 0 comments

There are currently no comments for this post.


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

Five tips for tackling a one-time project

Tech Management

Don't let a one-time project derail your career. An IT consultant shares tips on how to successfully manage a "once-in-a-career" event.


Read more »



Open source blog reloaded!

Blog thumbnail

This is with great pleasure that this "little corner of the Web" is resuming activities through another member of the (now famous ;-)) Beijing Linux User Group (BLUG) doing the..... by Fred Muller

Read more »

Tags

  1. acquisition
  2. acquisitions
  3. ceo
  4. china
  5. financial
  6. google inc.
  7. green it
  8. ibm corp.
  9. india
  10. industry
  11. information technology
  12. it outsourcing
  13. job
  14. microsoft corp.
  15. network
  16. outsourcing
  17. revenue
  18. singapore
  19. software
  20. u.s.