Rights groups rally against biometric passports

By Jo Best, Special to ZDNet Asia
Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:00 AM
Civil liberties groups from both sides of the Atlantic have joined forces to oppose the proposed introduction and cross-border sharing of biometrics and RFID in more than one billion passports worldwide.

Human rights organizations from Europe, North America, Australia and Asia have sent an open letter to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) railing against plans to create an international "identity register" that would force the inclusion of biometrics and controversial RFID tracking tags in all passports by 2015.

Among the 39 groups who put pen to paper are: Privacy International, the Foundation for Information Policy Research, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union.

The ICAO will be meeting in Cairo next week and will be discussing the scheme. If the ICAO approves it, facial mapping and tracking tags would become mandatory, with fingerprinting also on the drawing board, depending on the preferences of individual governments.

U.K.'s home secretary David Blunkett has already proved his fondness for biometrics of all kinds when he announced late last year that there would be trials for biometric ID, with iris or fingerprint recognition potentially on the cards.

The U.S. has also gone big on biometrics, photographing and fingerprinting visitors crossing its borders.

As well as voicing fears that the proposed database may "threaten (human) rights", the letter adds that the chosen standard of facial recognition may be unsound.

"The ICAO standards do not govern the use to which the facial recognition is put but even the most reliable uses of this technology--one-to-one verification using recent photographs--have been shown in U.S. government tests to be highly unreliable, returning a false non-match rate of five per cent and a false match rate of one per cent," it says, adding that there may be the potential for oppressive regimes to get their hands on methods of surveillance that were previously inaccessible.

"We hope that the choices of biometrics have been driven primarily by logistical and commercial concerns and were not intended to facilitate the conversion of travel systems into a global infrastructure of surveillance.

"But we are deeply concerned that this may become their unintended consequence," it concludes.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 1 comments

Biometric Passports will benefit everyone. In the face of international anarchy and rife, with these put into place, terrorists or any other forms of anarchists will be deterred. Human rights an issue? Did we have any in the 70s or before? Bottomline. no terrorists. Thumbs up for biometric passports.
Posted by Jack on Thursday, April 01 2004 09:40 AM


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

Hands-on programming: Extract plain text from documents with Syncfusion's components

Web Development

Justin James recently tried Syncfusion's Essential DocIO and Essential PDF to help him extract text from documents he downloaded from the Internet. Here's the code he wrote to get the plain text.


Read more »



Will technology divide us further?

Blog thumbnail

So I finally watched 2012 over the weekend, but the film left me feeling extremely agitated.

The possibility that the world may meet its watery end in three years didn't..... by Eileen Yu

Read more »

Tags

  1. battery
  2. camera
  3. graphics
  4. hard drive
  5. hewlett - packard co.
  6. high tech computer corp.
  7. intel corp.
  8. keyboard
  9. microsoft windows
  10. microsoft windows mobile
  11. mobile
  12. network
  13. notebook
  14. performance
  15. screen
  16. server
  17. storage
  18. touchpad
  19. usb
  20. vat