Lawsuit challenges new 'e-annoyance' law

By Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com
Friday, February 10, 2006 12:00 PM

A new law targeting "annoying" e-mail messages and Web posts is being challenged in federal court.

The plaintiff, a Web site that lets people send anonymous e-mail for a fee, said the suit was necessary because the law is so broad it makes providing the service a crime.

"What we are seeking to do is have that portion of the statute declared unconstitutional," said Charles Mudd, an attorney in Chicago who's representing TheAnonymousEmail.com.

As reported earlier by CNET News.com, U.S. President George Bush last month signed into law a massive bill for the Justice Department that includes the new criminal sanctions aimed at Internet communications that "annoy." The law prohibits anyone from posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing his or her true identity.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

TheAnonymousEmail.com, operated by a privately held Scottsdale, Ariz., company called The Suggestion Box, offers the ability to send anonymous messages for a US$19.95 subscription fee.

Howard Baer, the company's president, said the new law is so problematic it could criminalize filing a complaint against a public corporation under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act--if, that is, executives claimed the complaint was intended to "annoy" them.

The challenge to the "annoy" law, filed in federal district court in Arizona, asks for a preliminary injunction barring federal prosecutors from enforcing the rule. It claims the law's invocation of the word "annoy" is "ambiguous, overbroad and vague" and violates the First Amendment and the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The law, called the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act, amends existing law dealing with telephone calls by extending new criminal sanctions to the Internet. Unlike other legislative proposals dealing with voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), the "annoy" restrictions apply broadly to any form of Internet communications, not just VoIP.

Eugene Volokh, a UCLA law professor who wrote a book on the First Amendment, has said the "annoy" law may violate Americans' free speech rights. "Though the desire to annoy may sometimes be petty...it shouldn't strip the speech of constitutional protection," Volokh said.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 0 comments

There are currently no comments for this post.


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

Keep IMAP e-mail messages locally using OfflineIMAP

Open Source

Vincent Danen discusses the uses of OfflineIMAP for synchronizing local and remote IMAP mailboxes and providing a good method for backing up e-mail.


Read more »



Buying a projector? Try an LED TV instead

Blog thumbnail

If you're thinking of buying a new projector for your office meeting room, why not consider getting an LED TV instead. LED TVs are similar to LCD TVs except..... by Lee Lup Yuen

Read more »

Tags

  1. advertisement
  2. blog
  3. facebook
  4. google inc.
  5. internet
  6. internet advertising
  7. microsoft corp.
  8. network
  9. revenue
  10. search
  11. social networking
  12. software
  13. u.s.
  14. web
  15. web 2.0
  16. web browser
  17. web browsers
  18. web services
  19. web sites
  20. yahoo! inc.