Google says click fraud settlement near

By Elinor Mills, CNET News.com
Thursday, March 09, 2006 09:31 AM

Under a proposed US$90 million settlement of a class-action lawsuit over alleged click fraud, Google said Wednesday it would offer advertising credits to marketers who claim they were charged for invalid clicks and not reimbursed.

The total amount of credits, including attorneys fees, will max out at US$90 million, Nicole Wong, associate general counsel at Google, wrote in a Google blog posting.

The lawsuit, filed in February 2005 in state court in Texarkana, Ark., accused the defendant search engines of charging advertisers for clicks on online advertisements that were fraudulent or done in bad faith and not with the intention of legitimate commerce. The lawsuit was filed by Lane's Gifts and Collectibles and Caulfield Investigations against Google, Yahoo, Time Warner and its America Online and Netscape subsidiaries, Lycos, FindWhat.com, Buena Vista Internet Group doing business as Go.com, LookSmart and Ask Jeeves, now known as Ask.com.

"This agreement covers all advertisers who claim to have been charged but not reimbursed for invalid clicks dating from 2002 when we launched our 'cost per click' advertising program through the date the settlement is approved by the judge," Wong wrote.

Currently, advertisers have 60 days to seek a credit for clicks they believe are fraudulent.

"Under the agreement with the plaintiffs, we are going to open up that window for all advertisers, regardless of when the questionable clicks occurred," the posting said. "For all eligible invalid clicks, we will offer credits which can be used to purchase new advertising with Google."

The attorneys' fees, to be determined by the judge, will be charged as an expense, most likely in the first quarter, Wong wrote. The credits will be recorded as a reduction to revenue during the quarters in which they are redeemed, she said.

While Google and the plaintiffs have come to an agreement, a judge must approve it for it to be final, she said. The details are confidential but will become public when it is formally filed to the court, she said.

"By far, most invalid clicks are caught by our automatic filters and discarded before they reach an advertiser's bill," Wong wrote. "And for the clicks that are not caught in advance, advertisers can notify Google and ask for reimbursement. We investigate those clicks, and if we determine they were invalid, we reimburse advertisers for them. We will continue to do that, and believe that this settlement is further proof of our willingness to work together with advertisers to reimburse invalid clicks."

George McWilliams, one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs, said he could not comment on the details.

"It is our understanding that Google has announced today that a US$90 million settlement has been reached in connection with the click fraud litigation pending in Miller County, Arkansas Circuit Court," McWilliams, of the firm of Patton Roberts McWilliams & Capshaw in Texarkana, Texas, said in a phone interview. "Because the settlement is not final and must be approved by Circuit Judge Joe Griffin, we are not able to comment about the details about it at this time."

A legal expert who has been following the case said the settlement would be a good deal for Google.

"So with the settlement, Google effectively eliminates its entire legacy liability for click fraud for US$90 (million), only a portion of which is out-of-pocket cash. Given that the click fraud has been estimated in the billions, a US$90 (million) settlement sounds like an excellent deal," Eric Goldman, assistant professor of law at Marquette University Law School, wrote on his blog.

"Unfortunately, the settlement doesn't appear to resolve the basic question of what constitutes click fraud and when search engines are on the hook for it," he said. "On that front, Google still will have an advertiser relations issue that needs further attention."

Anywhere from 5 percent to 20 percent or more of clicks on Internet ads are fraudulent, according to estimates. Click fraud can be conducted by companies that want to rack up advertising costs for rivals or by Web site publishers who want to increase the amount of revenue they get from hosting ads on their site.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 0 comments

There are currently no comments for this post.


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

OpenAmplify developer's diary Part 4: Using OpenAmplify via SOAP

Web Development

Justin James walks you through the process of using the SOAP interface to OpenAmplify from Visual Studio 2008.


Read more »



When technology costs more than human

Blog thumbnail

Movie director James Cameron waited 15 years for technology to catch up before it was sufficiently advanced for him to create the much-anticipated upcoming film, Avatar.

To be released in..... by Eileen Yu

Read more »

Tags

  1. advertisement
  2. blog
  3. facebook
  4. google inc.
  5. internet
  6. internet advertising
  7. microsoft corp.
  8. network
  9. revenue
  10. search
  11. social networking
  12. software
  13. u.s.
  14. web
  15. web 2.0
  16. web browser
  17. web browsers
  18. web services
  19. web sites
  20. yahoo! inc.