Cable still best for video on demand

By Greg Sandoval, CNET News.com
Tuesday, August 14, 2007 10:04 AM

The Internet was supposed to be the primo way to distribute movies, but the past week has seen the sector take some body blows.

Google told customers on Friday that it is getting out of the video-on-demand business. Earlier in the week, five of the top motion-picture studios unloaded Movielink when they sold the online VOD service to Blockbuster for around US$20 million, according to the Wall Street Journal. The cost to develop the service: US$100 million.

Even good news for online video came in a bit smudged. Joost, the video service that operates on peer-to-peer technology developed by the creators of Skype, announced that it has topped 1 million users. The privately held company has signed content deals with some of the biggest entertainment companies, including Viacom, Warner Music and the National Hockey League, and done this while being in business for less than a year.

But Joost continues to wrestle with quality issues.

JoostTeam.com, a blog dedicated to delivery news about the site, compared the quality of video at Joost with that from Stage6, a video site created by DivX, a maker of video codecs. According to JoostTeam, Stage6's version of the H.264 platform performed better that Joost's.

All of this only proves that online video still has plenty of technology hurdles to overcome and is still a long way from supplanting traditional television or movie rentals.

Critics blame Movielink's failure to attract a large audience on the company's refusal to relax some of the Digital Rights Management (DRM). The service did not allow users to burn movies they purchased to disc.

Download speeds at most of the top online VOD services take longer than it does to walk to the nearest neighborhood video store. Video quality is often inferior to a DVD. Selections are modest at best.

The best VOD experience I have had recently was this weekend at my brother's place in Los Angeles. He is a Time Warner subscriber. We watched the robe-and-sandal epic, 300. The picture quality was great; we saw as much blood and gore as any DVD could offer. Scrolling through the purchasing menus took just minutes and the cost was US$4.

His service also offers Howard Stern, education shows, music videos, the Food Network, Comedy Central and a lot more. I know buying videos from a cable provider or introducing the words Time Warner into a tech story does not sound sexy.

But darn the service definitely worked well.

This article first appeared as a blog entry at CNET News.com.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 0 comments

There are currently no comments for this post.


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

Use shades of gray to enhance scale in Excel

Microsoft Office Suite

Excel's palette is generous, but don't throw buckets of pigment all over your spreadsheets just because you can.


Read more »



Ultimate 2012 recovery site: the moon

Blog thumbnail

Have you seen the disaster movie "2012"? A friend from Control Risks and I did, and we reluctantly concluded we wouldn't be able to write off the cost of our..... by Nathaniel Forbes

Read more »

Tags

  1. advertisement
  2. blog
  3. facebook
  4. google inc.
  5. internet
  6. internet advertising
  7. microsoft corp.
  8. network
  9. revenue
  10. search
  11. social networking
  12. software
  13. u.s.
  14. web
  15. web 2.0
  16. web browser
  17. web browsers
  18. web services
  19. web sites
  20. yahoo! inc.