Buying security products is often a waste of money

By Liam Tung, ZDNet Australia
Tuesday, February 19, 2008 09:15 AM

Businesses waste millions of dollars trying protecting their IT infrastructure but too many investment decisions are corrupted by poorly applied mathematics.

"I believe that industry, by and large, is wasting money on security today," said Gene Hodges, CEO of security firm, Websense.

Hodges said the need to feel secure has lead to business making poor investment decisions when it comes to IT security. This has resulted in money being disproportionately allocated to preventing attacks on IT infrastructure.

"Attacks were, for the '90s and the first half of this decade, focused on the infrastructure and the bad guys' objective was to take down your e-mail system, to take down your network connectivity through DDoS attacks...that's why we bought firewalls and antivirus, IDS and IPS.

"I think spending money on classic infrastructure security gives you a sense of security, but actually, you know ...it doesn't matter that much," he said.

Hodges' comments echo those of security guru Bruce Schneier, who recently warned business to avoid getting "caught up in the feeling of security, driven by fear".

But this doesn't mean that spending on security is a waste of money, according to Hodges, who said that overzealous budgets for securing infrastructure are wasteful because their relationship to a company's financial performance is more tenuous than say, data leakage.

"So what if some IT guys have to work over the weekend to clean up laptops. I mean, I'm sorry to say this but you know that's generally the way a CEO would feel.

"On the other hand, that same CEO, if he thought he was going to be embarrassed and the stock price depressed through a major data leak, he would be very happy to make that investment--and I think that's well beyond the feeling of security," Hodges told ZDNet Asia sister site ZDNet.com.au.

Schneier said that another problem faced by administrators is knowing how much security products are worth.

"If you've ever see one of those ROI models, what they do is measure the cost of an attack and then multiply it by the probability of an attack to give you how much money you should spend--this is how all insurance companies build their business model," Schneier told ZDNet.com.au in an interview.

"Maybe your reputation is worth US$20 million, or maybe it is only worth US$10 million, or maybe it is worth US$40 million. Suddenly I can completely perturb your budget--because the numbers are so big and so small, that minor changes perceptually make huge changes to the product. So I can make an ROI model say whatever I want," he added.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 0 comments

There are currently no comments for this post.


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

Cost and graphics concerns delay a VDI project

Tech Management

Virtual desktops are a serious paradigm shift and Scott Lowe is taking it in a slow and measured way. In this article, he provides an update on ongoing VDI efforts at Westminster College.


Read more »



Do we need more delivery centers?

Blog thumbnail

As I wrote a while back in about "racing to subsidies", there certainly is an increased focus by governments to attract delivery centers to their region. To do that, many..... by Michael Rehkopf

Read more »

Tags

  1. attack
  2. authentication and encryption
  3. blog
  4. data security
  5. e - mail
  6. hacking
  7. internet
  8. malware
  9. microsoft corp.
  10. network
  11. network security
  12. pc security
  13. researcher
  14. security
  15. security management
  16. software
  17. spam and phishing
  18. symantec corp.
  19. viruses and worms
  20. web