Researchers hack 'tamper-proof' PIN terminals

By Tom Espiner, ZDNet UK
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 09:15 AM

Researchers from Cambridge University have succeeded in capturing both PIN numbers and card details from supposedly tamper-proof PIN terminals.

Saar Drimer and Steven Murdoch, overseen by Professor Ross Anderson, managed to hack two widely used PIN terminals: the Ingenico i3300 and the Dione Xtreme.

In a research paper seen by ZDNet Asia sister site ZDNet UK, the researchers outline the hack. Both terminals have tamper-proof mechanisms inside, but both can be circumvented by tapping the data line of the PIN Entry Device/smartcard interface. The data exchanged on this line is not encrypted.

The Ingenico i3300 has a tamper-response switch inside which is tripped if the terminal is forced open, and also has its innards wrapped in a tamper-proof mesh, to detect drilling. However, there is a user-accessible compartment to insert SIM cards that is not intended to be tamper-proof. The PCB has various holes that an attacker can use to insert a conductor into the serial data line, to tap both the PIN and card details. The researchers used a paper clip as the conductor, linked to the data line.

The Dione Xtreme also has a tamper-response switch, but no mechanisms to detect drilling from the rear. The main keypad and processor are "potted together", making it more difficult to incept the signal passing between them. However, by drilling a 0.8mm hole from the rear, the researchers inserted a 4cm needle into a flat ribbon connector socket and tapped the data.

In both cases, the conductors were connected to a thin wire connected to a logic board containing a field programmable gate array (FPGA), which translated the data and sent it to a laptop.

Both devices were Visa-certified to be secure, which requires that defeating the tamper detection would cost over US$25,000 (£12,500) per-PIN entry device; or that inserting a PIN-stealing bug would be detected, or take more than 10 hours.

Neither terminal meets any of these requirements, said the researcher paper.

"What should have required US$25,000 needed just a bent paperclip, a needle, a short length of wire and some creative thinking; attaching them to the data line takes minutes with some practice," said the paper.

"What this shows is that PIN entry devices in the United Kingdom are very insecure," said Professor Anderson about the research. "What's more, the [device] certification process is completely defective. Certified devices are easy to breach. That's bad news for retailers, and bad news for customers."

Drimer added that this hack showed the complete process from design to implementation of these devices was broken.

"These devices should not have been certified because they clearly fail the criteria under which they were evaluated," Drimer told ZDNet UK. "Something went wrong in the design of these devices, the certification process, and the EMV implementation choices made by the banks."

Ingenico admitted that the hack was successful, but said that its device "still remained one of the safest on the market".

A spokesman for Ingenico Northern Europe said: "Retailers and card users should rest assured that the devices, from various suppliers, identified by the Cambridge University scientists, remain among the most secure terminals on the market and have contributed to card fraud at U.K. retailers falling by up to 47 percent year-on-year since the introduction of chip and PIN. The banking industry has already expressed its confidence in the security capabilities of all chip and PIN payment devices being used in the United Kingdom today.

"The method identified by the Cambridge University paper requires specialist knowledge and has inherent technical difficulties. This method is therefore not reproducible on a large scale, nor does it take into account the fraud monitoring used throughout the industry."

"Security remains a top priority for Ingenico and we invest around 40 million euros each year in research and development to ensure our customers remain at the forefront of the fight against fraud."

"This investment is highlighted in the latest generation of our terminals which are approved under the latest security standards. These meet the higher security required by industry mandates introduced on 1 January, 2008 and are designed to stay one step ahead of the evolving security threat."

Dione, which is manufactured by Verifone, had not responded to a request for comment at the time of writing.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 0 comments

There are currently no comments for this post.


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

Export project data for future effort estimation

Tech Management

Learn to tweak your estimation matrix even further by analyzing the project data from your Microsoft Project schedule.


Read more »



 
Virtualize your way to cost savings
Build an infrastructure that is flexible, scalable, and economical, as you strive to become a truly agile business.

Red Hat Outlines Its Virtualization Strategy and Roadmap for 2009
» Watch the video




Are telcos new drivers of outsourcing industry?

Blog thumbnail

The recent TPI Index from TPI highlighted an interesting trend where a few very large telco-to-telco contracts--instances where one telecommunications carrier outsources its network operations requirements to another telecommunications service..... by Michael Rehkopf

Read more »

Tags

  1. attack
  2. authentication and encryption
  3. blog
  4. data security
  5. e - mail
  6. hacking
  7. internet
  8. malware
  9. microsoft corp.
  10. network
  11. network security
  12. pc security
  13. researcher
  14. security
  15. security management
  16. software
  17. spam and phishing
  18. symantec corp.
  19. viruses and worms
  20. web