By
Yoonjung Yoo
Tuesday, October 17 2006 11:06 AM
URL:
http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0,39044215,61960166,00.htm
Even as Internet sites and
major portals continue to upgrade their sites in line with the Web 2.0 revolution, experts warn of security vulnerabilities associated with the phenomenon.
In September, Daum Communications--Korea's second largest Internet
services provider after NHN--introduced its AJAX (Asynchronous JavaScript and XML) based new homepage with an improved user
interface, personalized oriented services. Once the users are logged in, the
newly designed start page enables checking e-mail and Web log (blog) updates without having to go to different pages.
Yahoo! Korea also
came out with its latest Web 2.0/AJAX based homepage last August. The beta
version of the homepage which started in earlier May now offers more
personalized services to users.
Also recently, SK communications, another major player after Daum, introduced a new search engine service through its Nate and
Cyworld Web sites.
According to
industry experts however, these sites should not forget about security vulnerabilities that exist in Web 2.0.
Myspace.com and Yahoo incidents could be
duplicated in Korea too
The use of new interactive programming techniques such AJAX opens up opportunities for hackers to
hit a Web server, exploit sites and attack visitors. It also increases the
possibility of malicious attacks through cross-site scripting flaws (XSS),
experts said.
Worm attacks on Myspace.com or Yamanner targeting Yahoo.com all reveal security
vulnerabilities with Web 2.0.
"Sites like Myspace.com or Google
heavily use JavaScripts to write their interactive driven Web 2.0 service
programs," said AhnLab Coconut Inc. consultant Soomin Hong. "But we know attacks on Yahoo and Myspace.com surfaced through security
flaws in JavaScripts.
"These incidents are indication of security flaws within Web 2.0 that need to be
addressed. The domestic portals too are vulnerable and there is no guarantee
that they will not get victimized like Yahoo or Myspace.com," he added.
To defend against these kinds of malicious attacks, the
security experts recommend usage of Internet firewalls. Firewalls alone won’t solve all security issues but trying to rewrite Web code
(long hours with higher cost), especially when it lacks the ability to defend
using existing firewall, intrusion detection or prevention systems, is just as ineffective.
Implementation is another matter
The larger portals
acknowledge the need to beef up Web 2.0 security using firewalls but due to
their enormous traffic are unable to come up with required equipments that can
handle the job. The equipment that can digest chatting, cafe blogs and all other
contents are not available.
In addition, with all traffic
generated from the web there is huge cost involved with setting up Internet
firewall infrastructure. To defend against hundreds of different domains, huge expenses will be incurred.
"Portals realize the need for firewalls but are presently unable to implement them. Better management of parameters, prescreening for
attacks, and searching for weaknesses in source code are all they can do for now. However,
even with all these extra measures, the whole process is ultimately handled by a
person so the error of margin always exists," noted AnhLab's Hong.
In response to current market circumstances, SK’s Infosec, an information security outsourcer and Piolink
recently launched a 4GB Web firewall equipment to attract ISPs in need of
better Web security.
"Up to now, portals were reluctant to purchase the lower level
security hardware and wanted something that can handle more than 4 giga-levels," head of SK Inforsec’s business division Sungik
Hwang said. "To meet the need we plan to introduce 10 giga-level Web firewall equipment too."
Added the head of Piolink’s marketing division Jangno Lee: "We are centering our business on larger portals and e-shopping
malls. In a relatively short period, we should be able to build up a list of clients."
Yoonjung Yoo of ZDNet Korea reported from Seoul.