Don't stop using Linux: Japan gov't

By Staff, ZDNet Asia
Tuesday, August 26, 2003 08:00 AM
The Japanese government has acted to reassure companies jittery about the use of the Linux operating system in their products, saying that avoiding the platform would "hurt the lives of the people".

Earlier this month, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) issued a report meant to clarify licensing issues around the open source software, which lately has been under attack from The SCO Group for alleged copyright infringement.

"Unnecessary fears" about using Linux in Japan-made products could mean a "huge loss of opportunities for the software industry and the government to have access to it, and it would hurt the lives of the people," said the report, which was quoted in Nikkei Electronics News.

The METI report clarifies the GNU Public License (GPL), the rules governing how the software may legally be used and offers definitions of terms in Japanese. There are also comments by experts on how ambiguous areas of the GPL are to be interpreted, said the report.

SCO's campaign has thrown a spanner into Asian Linux efforts. In China, Korea and Japan, the operating system has received government approval and support as it offers a chance for domestic firms to develop products on a platform on a globally understood and adopted platform, yet is free of license fees.

Recently, Matsushita Electric, Sony, Hitachi, NEC, Royal Philips Electronics, Samsung, Sharp and Toshiba announced the Consumer Electronics Linux Forum, or CELF, a consortium designed to adapt and advance the operating system for use in consumer electronics.

The civil service in China and Japan also announced plans to use more non-Microsoft or Linux software on desktop PCs.

SCO shocked the IT world this year by filing a US$3 billion lawsuit against IBM, claiming that the computing giant illegally incorporated into its Linux software source code from the Unix operating system that SCO controls. SCO then sent letters to 1,500 information technology managers, warning them that any use of Linux could expose them to intellectual property suits.

The company then unveiled a licensing plan for businesses who wish to continue using Linux with SCO's blessing. Rates are comparatively steep--US$1,399 to run Linux on a server with a single CPU and US$32 to use it on an embedded non-PC gadget with computing power.

Darl McBride, the CEO of SCO, traveled to Japan last month to show corporate executives examples of Linux code which he claims contains lines of programming plagiarized from Unix, which SCO owns.

News.com's David Becker contributed to this report.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 7 comments

SCO said, they had three teams, including a team at MIT examine their "proof" of UNIX code improperly in Linux

1. There appears to be no such team at MIT. And SCO are back tracking on this claim.

www-tech.mit.edu...


2. Here is an example quote SCO made about MIT

www.computerworld.com...

"SCO was able to uncover the alleged violations by hiring three teams of experts, including a group from the MIT math department, to analyze the Linux and Unix source code for similarities. "All three found several instances where our Unix source code had been found in Linux," said a SCO spokesman.
Posted by anonymous on Tuesday, August 26 2003 08:59 AM

Sco said:

1. We have a team of Three MIT people ...
2. Well, they are not currently at MIT but they were
3. Well at least of them was at MIT
4. Well he has some connection with MIT

Finally we figured out that the connection with MIT was that the guy one day bought a
ice-cream from a studdent which it was at MIT :-)
Posted by anonymous on Wednesday, August 27 2003 04:12 AM

I liked the way the first person said it better.
Posted by A. Nonna Moose on Wednesday, August 27 2003 07:13 AM

Your coverage of the SCO situation is incomplete and misleading in that you do not mention that IBM has recently countersued SCO hased on its violation of no less than four patents.

Not only that, you also don't mention the total disproof of ownership of the bits of code publicly displayed by SCO at the recent SCO Forum by representatives of the Open Source movement.

Given that the code displayed had a copyright notice from SGI on it in its entirety, don't you think that saying that SCO owns Unix is a little strong? Mot to mention utterly misleading.

They own the rights to one VERSION of UNIX. Sys V to be precise. A version that is ten yers old and which contains NONE of the technologies they are so loudly laying claim to. NUMA? Didn't exist them. RC-UPD? Invented by IBM. SMP? That existed then, but in a very primitice state.

These yokels are doing nothing less than claiming that they own technology and IP that they DIDN'T INVENT AND DON'T OWN on the basis of derivative copyright ownership. This is not only unheard of, it is ridiculous to even contemplate.

The chance that any U.S. court will award them rights to such independantly derived technology is slim to none.

Yet your story mentions NONE of this and would lead one to believe that SCO has a chance in hell of succeeding in this naked grab for ownership of IP which they don't own and didn't invent. They sued IBM expecting to get bought out and have been floundering ever since.

They will soon vanish without a trace when IBM gets the injunction they have filed for in their countersuit. That injunction will not allow SCO to ship ANY of their current products. How long do think they will last as a going concern after that?

The credibility you and those like you have awarded to this lawsuit without a prayer in hell of succeeding is astounding to me.

You call yourselves REPORTERS?

Go find a job that suits your real talents. Try mucking the stalls at the local horse harn.

Yours,

Frank
Posted by Frank A, Love on Wednesday, August 27 2003 07:35 AM

Frank,

Chill, d00d. They've had countless articles here on News.com that have discussed all the details to which you're referring. They just didn't want to regurgitate every last point of fact in the SCO vs. Linux issue in this one article.

And name-calling is never the best way to get someone to honestly listen to you.

You're welcome!

-F.A.B.
Posted by Fatass Bastard on Wednesday, August 27 2003 08:44 AM

This brings to mind the big splash a few weeks ago of how McBride claims to speak fluent Japanese as he ran all over the orient making wild claims about Linux. Last week he likened himself to James Bond at the corporate meeting. He also claims that SCO owns Linux and everone should pay him. Last week-end he shut down the corporate website for updates then claimed it was taken out by Linux hackers. It is good to see another government stand up and take a stand against this purely delusional behavior from a clearly sick individual!
Posted by Fred Windish on Wednesday, August 27 2003 10:32 AM

Didn't SCO participated in GNU development? And now they want to charge?
Posted by Marjan on Wednesday, August 27 2003 03:59 PM


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

Save changes to all open Word documents at one time

Microsoft Office Suite

If your Word sessions often wind up with a lot of open documents, this obscure command can streamline the process of closing them and saving your changes.


Read more »



Do we need more delivery centers?

Blog thumbnail

As I wrote a while back in about "racing to subsidies", there certainly is an increased focus by governments to attract delivery centers to their region. To do that, many..... by Michael Rehkopf

Read more »

Tags

  1. antivirus
  2. apple ipod
  3. cnet networks inc.
  4. desktop
  5. e - mail
  6. hard drive
  7. intuit inc.
  8. mcafee inc.
  9. microsoft corp.
  10. microsoft windows
  11. microsoft windows vista
  12. microsoft windows xp
  13. norton co.
  14. pc
  15. performance
  16. security
  17. software
  18. tool
  19. web
  20. web site