Call for Asia to adopt ODF

By Aaron Tan, ZDNet Asia
Tuesday, August 08, 2006 06:16 PM

SINGAPORE--An official from the United Nations (U.N.) has called for countries in the Asia-Pacific region to embrace the OpenDocument format.

Sunil Abraham, manager of the International Open Source Network (IOSN) at the U.N., told ZDNet Asia that most governments in the region have already stated their support for open standards, through their respective government interoperability frameworks.

He hopes that governments in the region will now extend that support and "seriously consider" the OpenDocument Format (ODF).

Last month, Malaysia became the one of the first Asian countries to propose the use of ODF as a national standard for office documents. Hasannudin Saidin, a member of Sirim, the country's standards development agency, said on his blog last month that the proposal will now undergo approval from a higher-level committee within Sirim.

Public consultation on the proposal will stretch over two months, beginning in September and ending in October 2006, after which comments will be raised to the Malaysian Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation. According to Saidin, ODF is expected to become a Malaysian-defined standard MS 26300, by the year-end.

In the Philippines, there is no official policy on the adoption of ODF in the country, according to Peter Antonio Banzon, division chief of the Philippines' Advanced Science & Technology Institute, although the government agency has already standardized its internal documents on the ODF.

Because the country has a tradition of relying on a "market-driven approach" to adopting standards, a "huge amount of advocacy work" needs to come from the nation's senior policymakers to drive open standards in general, Banzon told ZDNet Asia. Still, he said that a few senior government officials have recognized the value of open standards, and are "quietly doing their share of advocacy to other decision makers [within the government sector]".

According to IOSN's Abraham, the lack of interoperability is stopping more governments from going ahead to mandate the ODF standard within their countries.

As there is "no full compatibility" between Microsoft Office and OpenOffice, the application most commonly used to create ODF files, Abraham said governments might face interoperability issues if they tried to work on Microsoft Office documents in OpenOffice.

"[By adopting proprietary standards], the government will become a marketing agent for proprietary software companies."
--Sunil Abraham
International Open Source Network (IOSN) at the United Nations
And that appears to be the main reason why the Singapore government is holding off any decision to adopt ODF.

A spokesperson for Singapore's Infocomm Development Authority told ZDNet Asia: "Many users today use the Microsoft Office suite and cannot read documents stored in ODF. It is therefore not practical for the government to adopt ODF as the only standard, as it will inconvenience a large number of users." "As new formats, such as ODF, achieve more widespread adoption among users, IDA will support them accordingly for the convenience of the public," she added.

The island-state's Ministry of Defense (Mindef), however, has gone ahead on its own to adopt the ODF after it made the decision to roll out OpenOffice in 2004.

According to Mindef CIO Cheok Beng Teck, ODF offers Mindef "true" ownership of its intellectual property. "We now know [how] the XML (extensible markup language) format [is implemented in] our documents, and have the freedom to manipulate it in whatever way we want," he told ZDNet Asia in an e-mail interview. "We are no longer tied down by the proprietary standards of a vendor."

Document preservation
A common argument that supports the adoption of ODF is document preservation. Because there is no guarantee that a software vendor will exist as a viable business decades later, governments may find themselves stuck with file formats that are no longer supported by any vendor or company in the market.

Abraham explained: "Most governments in this region are older than the software vendors that they are talking to, and they will almost certainly outlive the software vendors and developers. For government [document] archives, it is thus critical that [they] use open formats."

For instance, he noted that WordStar was a popular word processor used in the 1980s. But the software is no longer supported by any vendor, and it will be difficult to retrieve information stored in WordStar documents today.

"Data longevity is an important reason for governments to use open standards," Abraham said.

Moreover, governments often make documents publicly available through e-government initiatives. In such cases, Abraham said, governments that adopt proprietary standards are "forcing" citizens to either purchase proprietary software, or use unlicensed software, in order to access these documents.

"The government will become a marketing agent for proprietary software companies," he said. "It's important that citizens be able to consume [government] information without committing a crime. That is only possible if governments follow some form of open standards."


2 Next 

WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 2 comments

If they are serious about an ODF Plug-in for MSOffice, that installs easily and operates with complete transparency and without disruption to MSOffice bound business processes and accessibility add ons, they should contact us. The OpenDocument Foundation's ODF Plug-in instantly converts all MSOffice installations into high fidelity ODF productivity pumps. Our plug-in works inside MSOffice with a transparcency so complete, users will not know they are working in ODF unless they look at the file format extensions. MSBinaries are transparently converted to ODF, and ODF files can be transparently converted to MSBinaries if needed. Or, ODF can be set as the default format, converting everything into ODF.

There is zero disruption to existing business processes, including the use of assistive technologies. And the fidelity can be set so high as to be completely reflective to MSBinaries.

The current version of the ODF Plug-in now participating in the Massachusetts RFi trials includes the new ISO-OASIS ODF accessiblity and metadata eXtensions. As soon as the ODF OpenFormula eXtensions are completed, they will be quickly added to shipping version of the Plug-in.

For more information contact The OpenDocument Foundation at gary.edwards@OpenDocument.us. Every version of MSOffice from 1997 to 2007 is fully capable of producing and participating with workflows with perfect ODF.

~ge~

--
Gary Edwards
The OpenDocument Foundation, Inc.
Redwood City, CA USA 94063
(650) 365-0899
(650) 888-2268 c.
gary.edwards@OpenDocument.us
OpendocumentFoundation.us

Founding member of the OASIS OpenDocument TC, representing the OpenOffice.org Community

Founding member of the OpenDocument Foundation, Inc. - a USA 501c(3) non profit chartered in the public interest to support, develop and promote the OASIS OpenDocument XML file format.

OpenDocument is the world's first "universal file format". But it's also central to the future of the Open Internet. So the Foundation charter includes another most important objective. The Foundation seeks to increase the participation of open source communities and individuals in the formal "Open Standards" process. By joining OSS with vendors and traditional organizations in the work of perfecting truly Open Standards, the Foundation believes that the Open Internet we enjoy today will remain open for future generations to come.
Posted by Gary Edwards on Wednesday, August 09 2006 04:33 PM

As always, I am tickled to read comments from the BSA. Apart from being a front for a proprietary format vendor, I do not see any value they bring to the debate.

Let me address their comments one by one:
a) "It isn't the case that an open standard is always necessarily the best choice," he said. "There have been instances in the past where other de-facto standards such as SMTP (simple mail transfer protocol), fared better and were preferred by consumers to open standards such as the X.400, that existed at that time. With time, many of these de-facto standards eventually became open standards, including the SMTP."

Surely BSA you are deliberately confusing the whole open standards definition. SMTP is as open a standard as is X.400. One was committee designed and the other by practioners. SMTP, as an IETF (www.ietf.org) process, requires at least two independent implementations in order for it to be accepted. The entire SMTP standard is open, documented and implemented. The X.400 is open as well, but the standard was too onerous and cumbersome that it failed. Simplicity and implementability won out here - and SMTP became de facto.

b) "Goh explained: "The technology based on ODF continues to evolve, and it is still unclear whether the various performance criteria required by customer demand and need would be sufficiently met by ODF implementations."

By which does the BSA imply that the proprietary format would do better? Can a MSword97 .doc format be read by MSword95? The product is from the same vendor, but the same vendor hoodwinked unsuspecting millions to a forced upgrade.

c) "This is not to say that governments should artificially create the demand that would distort the market, and lead to inefficiencies and hamper innovation. Other standards are also likely to emerge over time."

By the same token, is the BSA saying that it is OK for governments to "artificially create demand and distory the market" by going with a proprietary format? If anything else, when data is stored in published formats, the door is now wide open to all to come up with ideas and applications/products to harness the data stored within. Surely, BSA, that can only be a good thing? Do remember that the data is owned by the creator of the data not the vendor of the tool used. To continue to be beholden to the tool vendor to access one's data tantamounts to blackmail and extortion.

d) "Using only one standard exclusively for the wrong purpose would not work, even if it is an open standard."

Implying then that if the document was proprietary, it would be OK? Sure, BSA, you jest.

I think the BSA should not be talking about standards and stuff related to documents. They should let Microsoft fight it's own battle.

Harish Pillay
Posted by Harish Pillay on Thursday, August 10 2006 09:26 AM


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

A look at the Terminal Services Manager in Windows Server 2008

Windows Server

Terminal Services Manager has been around for a while, but Microsoft made some changes to the utility in Windows Server 2008. Here's what you'll find.


Read more »



Open source blog reloaded!

Blog thumbnail

This is with great pleasure that this "little corner of the Web" is resuming activities through another member of the (now famous ;-)) Beijing Linux User Group (BLUG) doing the..... by Fred Muller

Read more »

Tags

  1. antivirus
  2. apple ipod
  3. cnet networks inc.
  4. desktop
  5. e - mail
  6. hard drive
  7. intuit inc.
  8. mcafee inc.
  9. microsoft corp.
  10. microsoft windows
  11. microsoft windows vista
  12. microsoft windows xp
  13. norton co.
  14. pc
  15. performance
  16. security
  17. software
  18. tool
  19. web
  20. web site