Virtualization--'end of Windows as we know it'

By Andrew Donoghue, ZDNet UK
Friday, August 25, 2006 09:19 AM

Analyst group Gartner believes that virtualization will allow Microsoft to create a more flexible operating system platform in the future based around modularity.

The claim, which has been rejected by Microsoft, stems from the argument that the current Windows architecture is unsustainable for Microsoft and its customers.

In a research note released this week, Vista Will Be the Last Major Windows Release as We Know It, the analyst group claims that the trend of building ever more functionality into Windows may be reversed thanks to the virtualization technology which will soon be integrated into the operating system.

Microsoft customers need the way Windows is developed and released to change, as deploying the gargantuan operating system is too costly and complex at present. In turn, the vendor needs to accelerate the rate at which it releases and updates Windows to satisfy users who have signed up to its bulk-buy automated upgrade Software Assurance (SA) programme.

The software giant has made some attempts to slim down the OS by rebuilding Windows into a stack of more than 50 discrete layers, says Gartner. This strategy has gone some way to rationalizing the complexity of the operating system but it's not enough, the analyst group warns.

The key technology which will allow for smaller, discrete and more frequent versions of Windows is virtualization, which effectively separates the operating system from the underlying hardware. "Once Windows includes virtualization at its core, we expect OS deployment to change direction from integration to modularization. Microsoft will then use modularity to change the packaging and delivery model for future versions of Windows," the report stated.

However Microsoft is being cagey about whether the strategy laid out by Gartner is the way it plans to go. According to the analyst report: "Microsoft disagrees with this vision of its client operating system. It claims its research has identified significant issues with using hardware virtualization as a means of modularity due to the challenges associated with integrating data across partitions and creating a consistent user experience."

Virtualization generally refers to the ability to run multiple operating systems simultaneously to make a computer more efficient. Intel and AMD have added virtualization hardware support to their latest chips, while market leader VMware is exerting price pressure on Microsoft and the Xen project is giving Linux a major lead over Windows.

Microsoft is working on adding improved virtualization technology, known as hypervisor, to its server software but hasn't released any real information regarding the impact on the client. According to Bob Muglia, senior vice president of Microsoft's server and tools business, virtualization will not come with Vista Server, but as an add-on that will ship within six months of the server release.


WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 2 comments

Windows is now a legacy OS for my company backend. We moved Windows to VMware hosted on Linux. It is more stable and easier to maintain that way. Linux is getting capable to host all our services and it is conceivable to move the desktops to Linux as well to reduce and support.
Posted by anonymous on Saturday, August 26 2006 12:03 AM

if only Microsofts engineers took 'Operating Systems 101' in college. They might have learned that keeping executable program code partitioned from application data code is a VERY IMPORTANT concept.
So now, here they are in 2006, attempting to figure out a way to keep hackers from easily running unauthorized programs from application space.
Virtualization will protect other VMs from a breakin and there's even the posibility of creating a new CPU design to help with this FLAWED design. But, there's one problem with this. Microsoft has put much effort into selling its "integration" capabilities as the reason MS Windows and the Microsoft software stacks should be used instead of GNU/Linux and the OSS stacks.
There still in quite the pickle at a time when the business community is really getting sick of allocating too large a portion of revenues to IT budgets.
IMO, VMs are the way to move OSS onto MS Windows for huge cost savings instead of moving more versions of MS Windows onto MS Windows.
Think of it this way, one petri dish is going to 'attractive' to X number of viruses. N*X number of petri dishes are going to be attractive to N*X number of viruses. That is unless Microsoft once again builds a new version of MS Windows from the ground up AND is able to sell this, once again, to its customers. And they really have to actually do it too. But, IMO, it'll be too little, too late by that time.
Posted by anonymous on Wednesday, August 30 2006 03:11 PM


Tech Jobs Now!

Search for your ideal tech job:

Hands-on programming: Extract plain text from documents with Syncfusion's components

Web Development

Justin James recently tried Syncfusion's Essential DocIO and Essential PDF to help him extract text from documents that he downloaded from the Internet. Here's the code that he wrote to get the plain text from the document.


Read more »



Will technology divide us further?

Blog thumbnail

So I finally watched 2012 over the weekend, but the film left me feeling extremely agitated.

The possibility that the world may meet its watery end in three years didn't..... by Eileen Yu

Read more »

Tags

  1. antivirus
  2. apple ipod
  3. cnet networks inc.
  4. desktop
  5. e - mail
  6. hard drive
  7. intuit inc.
  8. mcafee inc.
  9. microsoft corp.
  10. microsoft windows
  11. microsoft windows vista
  12. microsoft windows xp
  13. norton co.
  14. pc
  15. performance
  16. security
  17. software
  18. tool
  19. web
  20. web site