By
Stephen Shankland
Thursday, September 16 2004 09:40 AM
URL:
http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/software/0,39044164,39193883,00.htm
Microsoft is refining its "Get the Facts"
Linux attack, taking specific aim at Red Hat, Novell and IBM rather
than the broader movement around the open-source operating system.
The new phase tactic from the fact that the vast majority of Linux
users buy their software from a company rather than downloading and
assembling freely available products on their own, said Martin Taylor,
general manager of Microsoft's platform strategy, in an interview
Wednesday. For the effort, Microsoft will compare its own products to
those of its competitors--for example, Red Hat's application server software for running Java software.
"It's less about Linux and more about Red Hat, Novell and IBM," Taylor said.
Taylor is Microsoft's top executive in charge of responding to the
Linux and open-source threat, which in many cases has displaced
Microsoft as the assumed heir to the Unix throne. The cooperative
programming model, with freely shared intellectual property, flies in
the face of Microsoft's proprietary approach, which closely guards
source code.
Taylor's methods include funding analyst firm studies, launching a "Get the Facts"
advertising campaign and discouraging Microsoft executives from making
any more inflammatory comments that open-source software is a "cancer"
or "un-American." Taylor meets with customers worldwide and has begun expanding the Microsoft attack to Europe.
Taylor said he expects that targeting Linux sellers such as Red Hat and
Novell will be persuasive to software customers. However, he said
Microsoft recognizes that it will have to use different tactics for
capturing the interest of students and programmers, where the
philosophical appeal of open-source software can rival pragmatic
considerations.
"We've got to figure out the coolness factor a little bit," Taylor
said of Microsoft's efforts to build student involvement. So far,
Microsoft's response has been to try to shape curriculum and engage
student interest with programming contests such as Imagine Cup.
Being "first to cool"
is an official corporate priority, along with being first to market and
first to make a lot of money, according to a July speech from Chief
Executive Steve Ballmer.
Microsoft also gathering ammunition by working to dispel its own
Linux ignorance--for example, by hiring Linux experts such as Bill
Hilf, who built eToys' Web site on Linux and promoted Linux for IBM.
Hilf joined Microsoft in January, Taylor said.
"Our guys have not had that line of sight. Our developer guys knew a
lot about our stuff," but for Linux and open-source expertise,
Microsoft's staff had to start from scratch or rely on third-party
consultants, he said.
As a result, Microsoft now has a better idea of what Linux has and what Redmond needs for the high-performance computing edition of Windows, Taylor said.
As open-source software projects have grown from hobbies to widely
used products, companies such as Red Hat, MySQL and Zend have arrived
to support them. Taylor predicted those companies will gradually grow
more remote from the free-form open-source programming community as
they fulfill commercial requirements such as testing to ensure that
updates don't break existing software.
"What we're beginning to see is you can only be 16 for a year, then
after that you have to deal with some aging issues," he said.
Microsoft's campaign so far has argued that the total cost of
ownership (TCO) and security of Microsoft products beats out Linux. So
far, Taylor said that Microsoft probably has made more headway with
customers on the first of the two subjects.
"It's going to be a while before customers say Microsoft has an
advantage for security, probably because of the pain they have felt
over the past year," Taylor said. "I feel better about TCO than I do
about security."
CNET News.com's Ina Fried contributed to this report.