By
Ina Fried
Thursday, October 06 2005 11:17 AM
URL:
http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/software/0,39044164,39274459,00.htm
The U.S. Patent Office has rejected two Microsoft patents over the FAT
file format, but the software maker said Wednesday that it's not ready to give
up its battle to protect its widely used method for storing data.
The patent office delivered its ruling late last month but made it public
this week. With one of the patents, the decision is what's considered a final
rejection, while with another it's considered nonfinal. In both cases, Microsoft
has the ability to pursue its claims further.
The rejections come after a re-examination
of the patents was sought by the Public Patent Foundation, which argued
that they were invalid because there was "prior art," that is, evidence that
others had done similar work before Microsoft's patent application. A U.S.
Patent Office examiner issued a preliminary
rejection of one Microsoft patent in September 2004.
Though developed for Windows, the FAT format has become a common means of
storing files on all manner of computers, as well as on removable flash memory
cards used in digital cameras and other devices. It is also used by the
open-source Samba software that lets Linux and Unix computers exchange data with Windows
computers, and by Linux itself to read and write files on Windows hard drives.
There has been concern that if the FAT patents are upheld, Microsoft may
claim that Linux infringes on Microsoft technology and will seek a royalty. Any
monetary compensation could threaten the operating system, which under General Public License (GPL) terms may not be distributed if
it contains patented technology that requires royalty payments.
A Microsoft representative said Wednesday that the company considers the
latest rejections somewhat of a victory because the examiners have rejected the
prior-art claims. Microsoft said the latest rejections are centered on how the
inventor of the patents is listed.
"None of the prior art submitted by the Public Patent Foundation stood up
under examination," Microsoft Director of Business Development David Kaefer said
in a statement. "The issues that have come up in these re-examinations have
nothing to do with (non-Microsoft) prior art. Instead, the issues involve a
question over whom--at Microsoft--should be properly listed as an inventor."
A Public Patent Foundation representative was not immediately available for
comment.
Microsoft announced plans
to license the FAT format in December 2003, as part of a stepped-up
intellectual-property licensing push. It announced at the time that flash memory
seller Lexar Media was taking a license for its FAT format technology.