Tech

Guides
 

How attractive is a US$399 Mac clone?

By Sol E. Solomon, ZDNet Asia
Friday, May 16, 2008 05:26 PM

Apple's current pricing strategy may encourage buyers in the Asia-Pacific region to turn away from Mac-cloned machines, says an IDC analyst.

Apple's strategy in recent years of setting more affordable prices for its computers in the Asia-Pacific region, could make Mac clones unattractive if such machines are made available here.

Reuben Tan, IDC's Asia-Pacific senior manager of personal systems, told ZDNet Asia that current prices of Apple systems make it hard to justify the purchase of Mac clones.

"Five years ago, the opportunity may have been there for the makers of such products," Tan said in a phone interview. "Apple used to focus on the high-end [market segment] but is now moving to the mainstream with features like Boot Camp."

Boot Camp is a utility tool, which comes with Apple's Mac OS X v10.5 "Leopard" operating system, that enables users to install Windows XP or Vista on Intel-based Mac computers.

Florida-based Psystar in April began selling, in the United States, its Open Computer product line that runs on Apple's Mac OS X.

The basic model, with a price tag of US$399, is advertised as featuring a 2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU, 2GB of DDR 2 memory, a 250GB hard disk drive, multi-format DVD writer and integrated graphics. A copy of Leopard adds US$150 to the computer's price. This model is comparable to Apple's lowest-cost model Mac Mini, in the United States, which is priced at US$599 and features less powerful hardware components.

However, Open Computer users could face potential legal ramifications as Apple's end-user licensing agreement (EULA) expressly forbids installing OS X on a non-Apple computer.

At press time, Apple did not respond to ZDNet Asia's queries about the market for Mac clones.


See also:  Mac OS, Desktops

WORTHWHILE?

0

0 votes
Blog

Talkback 1 comments

Redundant and boring story.
This "story" is a non-event at this point. Boringly redundant with nothing new that hasn't be rehashed over and over and over again. Like do you think that if you keep saying the same things, it will somehow change? Until something different happens, why not just let it go? It simply isn't important any more.
Posted by Jon Markle on Monday, May 19 2008 12:42 AM

Guest user

Guest user

Level: 
Joined: —
Already a member? Log in »



 

Loading...

Whitepapers / Case Studies

Downloads

SMB News


Tech Jobs Now!

Tags

  1. access
  2. active
  3. analysis
  4. availability
  5. data
  6. directory
  7. do
  8. double-take
  9. excel
  10. field
  11. high
  12. java
  13. management
  14. microsoft
  15. page
  16. ports
  17. project
  18. secure
  19. server
  20. service
  21. services
  22. should
  23. simply
  24. sql
  25. time
  26. tips
  27. use
  28. using
  29. windows
  30. word