Two simple but effective usability inspection techniques - Tech Management - Techguide

Two simple but effective usability inspection techniques

 

Summary

There are ways to improve the usability of software without huge time or resources.

Events

Echelon 2012
June 11 and 12, 2012

University Cultural Centre, National University of Singapore

Startup Asia Jakarta 2012
June 7 and 8, 2012

12th Floor, Annex Building, Wisma Nusantara Complex, Jl. M.H. Thamrin No. 59 Jakarta 10350, Indonesia

MMA Forum Singapore
April 23-25, 2012

Grand Hyatt Singapore

These two techniques can improve the usability of your software without needing large amounts of time or resources

The support of managers, colleagues and customers in the development and testing of a complex product or web site is vital.

Planning the sequence of events and judging the time required can be hard to estimate, and this is often particularly true for usability engineering because of its relatively high reliance on subjective data. This element of uncertainty is a factor which can increase the risk that usability testing is kept to a minimum or dispensed with altogether, especially if usability testing is not part of a formalised department or process.

Much of the development work carried out by usability engineers is intended to address the time and resource-intensive nature of the usability testing process with a view to ensuring that at least some testing gets done. Certain testing techniques are now widely used as methods of gaining a good general overview of a product’s usability as well as a quick way of identifying potential as well as actual problems. Many of these can be done by a small number of people in a single day or afternoon, but represent a significant investment in product quality.

Two of the most popular belong to a set of techniques called Usability Inspection methods, and are known as Thinking Aloud and Cognitive Walkthrough:

Thinking aloud
Thinking Aloud is a deceptively simple technique whereby a test participant performs a sequence of tasks as part of their interaction with the product. Instead of relying on the standard measures of task completion, error and usability engineer’s observations, the test participant is asked to vocalise their thoughts, intentions, feelings and opinions throughout the entire testing procedure, which can be recorded on video or simply written down by an observer.

Thinking Aloud improves with practice since the articulation of internal thoughts requires its own effort which may distract from the actual task at hand. Typically the test participant will be asked to try the technique by articulating the act of picking up a pencil, observing and describing the pencil, forming an intention to use the pencil, deciding whether to sharpen it or not, and beginning to write. Once they are comfortable with this they can begin to use your product or web site, articulating their observations and intentions as they do so.

Thinking Aloud is a very direct route to important information about the way users form goals and intentions and the kind of strategies they evolve to meet these goals. This technique can reveal mismatches between what users are looking for versus what they are actually seeing and show how real events happening with the product map onto user expectations (or not). The terminology users employ to express themselves can be incorporated into the product to enhance understanding. Periods of apparent silence or user inactivity can become rich sources of usability information, quickly and cheaply.

Cognitive walkthrough
Cognitive Walkthrough can take place very early on in the design of a product, often before any physical material is available for viewing or testing. The process involves an expert evaluator (who may be an expert in the type of product under test, but also requires some awareness of usability issues) ‘walking through’ a set of tasks likely to be attempted by a user. The reviewer behaves as if the interface were actually built and they (in the role of a typical user) were working through the tasks. Each step the user would be expected to take is scrutinised to ensure that an appropriate sequence of events is both possible and obvious. Any points at which the interface blocks the user from completing the task are identified and the missing interface object specified.

Cognitive Walkthroughs can be performed using tools as simple as pen and paper, with the various interface elements and their effect on user goal achievement recorded and modified as necessary. This technique captures both the thought-based (cognitive) aspects of user interaction as well as the physical actions (button presses, mouse clicks etc) and quickly identifies unnecessary complexity and omissions.

Both Thinking Aloud and Cognitive Walkthrough are low-cost techniques requiring minimal investment in expertise and time, but yielding a comparatively rich usability data set. Their effectiveness means that both techniques have been considerably enhanced over time, with versions including, for example, ground rules to prevent testers losing focus or becoming defensive over interface elements they may have designed themselves. Even without formal usability testing resources, either of these inspection methods can provide a powerful data set for product improvement.

Joanna Bawa is a usability consultant and technical writer. She has worked with small agencies and large corporations for the past 15 years to analyse, review and improve upon the quality and usability of their information.

Talkback

Add your opinion

In order to post a comment, you need to be registered. (Sign In or register below)

Post your comment

ZDNet Asia Live

@EileenZDNetAsia sounds like they need to change biz models, since no one is paying for that stuff and piracy is eating their lunch.

Maybe I should play Words with Friends again. http://t.co/JQ92Bwap

RT @wenonalok: Fact: Korean music industry uses Swedish writers! #MM12

Sony to stop feature phone sales in India by Sept. Bold or foolish move? http://t.co/HfkHxaUY #li

Win Phone devs, how important is it to integrate Win Phone with Windows and Xbox Live platforms? http://t.co/Qr2YACzJ #li

Govt aid for staff training growing in importance http://t.co/C8aOMeNU http://t.co/erFSwAUB #arcavir

http://t.co/VNaUVSe1 Govt aid for staff training growing in importance: Governments' role in... http://t.co/ziZpIsyi http://t.co/wiqTBKkj

Govt aid for staff training growing in importance. http://t.co/9FftpZ9d

Sony Mobile yanks feature phones from India - ZDNet Asia: Zee NewsSony Mobile yanks feature phones from IndiaZDN... http://t.co/c9xuPaeR

RT @MarioKaestner: Mobile #CRM gives better ROI than social http://t.co/1VahI35K Gartner via @KANASoftware

Japanese e-commerce provider Rakuten expands SEA footprint with entrance into M'sia, after Thailand and Indonesia. http://t.co/Xm28UgUL #li

Panel at #mm12 say music licensing process complex, expensive, time-consuming in Asia. Is tat why the likes of iTunes isn't in this region?

@EileenZDNetAsia What makes Asia different from elsewhere?

@joonian 360 degree biz model, which requires service providers to pay in advance licensing fees before they even begin to sell the music.

Sony Mobile yanks feature phones from India - ZDNet Asia http://t.co/1mVJNGBi

The key for mobile operators is identifying the applications that are popular with subscribers on their network. They can then work partn...

6 hours ago by camcullen on Experience trumps content in apps monetization

So much as we know , MTK6575 extremely integrated frequency1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 processor, the superiority of 3G / HSPA Modem, and help the...

2 days ago by y15822137359 on 5 SaaS adoption speed bumps to avoid

I reckon your view: "CRM is strategy, not software", if a company replicating the approach uses in ERP implementation into CRM, what they...

3 days ago by wykoong on Gartner: Mobile CRM gives better ROI than social

This video will teach you about the Excel fill handle but also provide you with a workook to download... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=...

3 days ago by TradeBrother on A quick fill handle trick for Microsoft Excel

waiting...

5 days ago by eapete on What should count in a company's market value?

Boy, you've opened a can of worms now.

Wait for the rants & raves.

5 days ago by eapete on What should count in a company's market value?

I was puzzling before this whether to replicate the success formula we executed for a financial institute, and come out with a standard s...

6 days ago by wykoong on Drop the egos, copy ideas, then innovate